ABSTRACT
Background Highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N6) virus poses a continuous threat to human health since 2014. Although neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are prescribed in most patients infected with the H5N6 virus, the fatality remains high, indicating the need for an improved treatment regimen. Sirolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has been reported to reduce viral replication and improve clinical outcomes in severe H1N1 infections when combined with oseltamivir. Here, we report the first case of severe H5N6 pneumonia successfully treated by sirolimus and NAIs. Case Description A 22-year-old man developed high fever and chills on September 24, 2018 (Day-0) and was hospitalized on Day-3. Influenza A (H5N6) was identified on Day-6 from a throat swab specimen. Despite the administration of NAIs and other supportive measures, the patient’s clinical conditions and lung images showed continued deterioration, accompanied by persistently high viral titers. Consequently, sirolimus administration (rapamycin;2 mg per day for 14 days) was started on Day-12. His PaO2/FiO2 values and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score gradually improved, and imaging outcomes revealed the resolution of bilateral lung infiltrations. The viral titer gradually decreased and turned negative on Day-25. Sirolimus and NAIs were stopped on the same day. The patient was discharged on Day-65. Based on observations from a 2-year follow-up, the patient was found to be in a good condition without complications. Conclusions In conclusion, sirolimus might be a novel and practical therapeutic approach to severe H5N6-associated pneumonia in humans.
ABSTRACT
Effective therapies are urgently needed for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Chloroquine has been proved to have antiviral effect against coronavirus in vitro. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of chloroquine with different doses in COVID-19. In this multicenter prospective observational study, we enrolled patients older than 18 years old with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection excluding critical cases from 12 hospitals in Guangdong and Hubei Provinces. Eligible patients received chloroquine phosphate 500 mg, orally, once (half dose) or twice (full dose) daily. Patients treated with non-chloroquine therapy were included as historical controls. The primary endpoint is the time to undetectable viral RNA. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with undetectable viral RNA by day 10 and 14, hospitalization time, duration of fever, and adverse events. A total of 197 patients completed chloroquine treatment, and 176 patients were included as historical controls. The median time to achieve an undetectable viral RNA was shorter in chloroquine than in non-chloroquine (absolute difference in medians -6.0 days; 95% CI -6.0 to -4.0). The duration of fever is shorter in chloroquine (geometric mean ratio 0.6; 95% CI 0.5 to 0.8). No serious adverse events were observed in the chloroquine group. Patients treated with half dose experienced lower rate of adverse events than with full dose. Although randomized trials are needed for further evaluation, this study provides evidence for safety and efficacy of chloroquine in COVID-19 and suggests that chloroquine can be a cost-effective therapy for combating the COVID-19 pandemic.